"You who bring good tidings... lift your voice with a shout... do not be afraid... 'Here is your God!'" (Isa. 40:9)

Chemical Sensitivity Book Excerpt

Posted on April 14th, 2009 in Chemical Sensitivity by Jonnie Wright

Chemical Sensitivities - The Body’s Strategy for Minimizing Risk?

by Dr. Mark Donohoe
March 26, 2009

Chemical Sensitivities - The Body's Strategy for Minimizing Risk? Dr. Mark Donohoe is an Australian GP specialized in Environmental Medicine, with a special interest in ME/CFS and chemical sensitivities, adverse effects of medications, and vaccination issues (see Dr. Mark’s Medical Site).

This article is excerpted from a book on multiple chemical sensitivities – Killing Us Softly - that Dr. Donohoe has offered online for free download and sharing. He asks only that those who wish to share the book do it by passing on the link to his download page (http://web.mac.com/doctormark/DoctorMark/KUS.html).

OLFACTION AND IMMUNITY

The olfactory nerve, the first cranial nerve, is not a nerve at all. At least not in the usual sense of a nerve. It is, in my opinion, the strangest organ one could imagine. It is mysterious, primitive, courageous and an absurdity all at once.
read more

Non-Toxic Household Cleaners

Posted on January 22nd, 2009 in Life Issues, Chemical Sensitivity, Health News by Jonnie Wright

DIY Household Cleaners

May 3, 2007

Photo: Mixing powders with liquid

Photo courtesy Shutterstock Images

The healthiest, least-toxic cleaners you can find are the ones you make yourself. They’re effective too: According to a study at Virginia Tech, spraying hydrogen peroxide and vinegar right after one another is just as effective at killing germs as lung-irritating, stream-polluting chlorine bleach. Here are a few easy cleaner recipes to kick-start your Saturday chores.

EIGHT ESSENTIALS
These eight items make up the basic ingredients for nearly every do-it-yourself cleaning recipe.

Baking soda: provides grit for scrubbing and reacts with water, vinegar or lemon by fizzing, which speeds up cleaning times
Borax: disinfects, bleaches and deodorizes; very handy in laundry mixes
Distilled white vinegar: disinfects and breaks up dirt; choose white vinegar over apple cider or red vinegars, as these might stain surfaces
Hydrogen Peroxide: disinfects and bleaches
Lemons: cut grease; bottled lemon juice also works well, although you might need to use bit more to get the same results
Olive oil: picks up dirt and polishes wood; cheaper grades work well
Vegetable based (liquid castile) soap: non-petroleum all-purpose cleaners
Washing soda: stain remover, general cleaner, helps unblock pipes; should be handled with gloves due to its caustic nature. Washing soda is usually found in the laundry aisle of grocery and drug stores.

Don’t forget to pick up an empty spray bottle at the hardware store, and keep those old rags and used toothbrushes for wiping up and scrubbing.

WHOLE HOUSE

All-Purpose Cleaner
1/2 cup borax
1 gallon hot water

Mix in pail (or use smaller amounts in a spray bottle: 1/8 cup borax to 1 quart of hot water) dissolving the borax completely; wipe clean with rag.

Floors

Wood
1/4 cup white vinegar
1 gallon warm water

Linoleum
1 cup white vinegar
2 gallons warm water

Mix in mop bucket, rinse afterwards.

Furniture Polish
1/2 cup white vinegar
1 teaspoon olive oil

Mix and apply with a clean rag to dust and polish. Reduce the olive oil if wood looks too oily.

Metal Polish

Copper and Brass
2 Tbsps salt
White vinegar

Add vinegar to salt until you’ve created a paste. Adding flour will reduce abrasiveness. Apply with a rag and rub clean.

Stainless Steel
Baking soda
White vinegar

Apply baking soda with a damp cloth, using the vinegar to eliminate spots.

Everyday Toxins

Posted on January 18th, 2009 in Chemical Sensitivity, Health News by Jonnie Wright

A  Red Alert from:

Parents Against Everyday Poisons (P.A.E.P.)

parentsagainsteverydaypoisons@live.ca

Making Tomorrow Safe for OUR Children!

Some of you may have heard of Dr. Anne Steinemann.  In the summer of 2008, her scientific research uncovered high levels of toxic chemicals in the best-selling brands of dryer sheets, laundry detergents and air fresheners.  Dr. Steinemann h as now revealed this list of toxic chemicals  to one of PAEP’s researchers along with the health damage they cause.   I have to warn you all — many of the health effects of these toxins will shock you. Many of us have been influenced by ”slick” advertising to use these “undeclared” toxins on a daily basis in everything from our familes’ clothing to bedsheets.  It would seem, in doing so, that we are living and sleeping with the enemy.   It must be emphasized here that one of Dr. Steinemann’s most disturbing findings was that there is no law that requires toxic contents be reported to the public if those contents are part of a fragrance formulation.   Chemical companies hide behind “proprietary secrecy rights”  for fragrance. and thus, are able to do as they please.  This is a loophole that North American Chemical Companies have taken advantage of in order to make extremely large profits   (Procter & Gamble 2007 - $36.2 Billion in sales- yes, Billion - in household care products alone) from a toxic industry which sells “everyday poisons” into our homes.  In the meantime, OUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN are not protected by any government regulation due to legal loopholes  — shame, shame - on the governments that allow this to go on.

Truth is for Sharing - Feel Free to Pass it On !

Billion Dollar Brands for Procter & Gamble quoted from P&G 2007 Annual Report:

Gain, Tide, Dawn, Downy, and Ariel

read more…

What is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity?

Posted on November 20th, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity by Jonnie Wright

What is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity?

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a health problem where sensitive people– some studies show up to 30% of the general population– react unfavorably to very low levels of synthetic chemicals in the environment from things like pesticides, cigarette smoke, paint fumes, wood preservatives, photocopier fumes, perfumes and epoxy. Symptoms vary from fleeting to severe and might include rapid heart rate, shortness of breath, fatigue, flushing, dizziness, nausea, coughing, or difficulty concentrating (reference).

People with MCS are often call “canaries.” The name comes from an old practice of miners who took canaries with them into the mines; if the canary died from toxic air in the shaft, the miners had time to escape with their lives. People with chemical sensitivities are the canaries of the modern world.

But the truth is, it’s not just chemically sensitive people who are being affected by a toxic environment. The general public is being exposed to tens of thousands of chemicals that didn’t even exist until a few decades ago. Many of these chemicals, some found in everyday household products like cleansers and cosmetics, are known to be or are suspected of causing cancer, reproductive problems, developmental disabilities, and heart disease (reference).

People are raising a stink about toxic household cleansers, clothing and fabrics, electronics, cosmetics and personal care items, perfumes and fragrances, deodorizers, cleansers and soaps. The public is making smarter choices like non-toxic paints and building materials, organic gardens and foods, natural cleansers and fabrics, and electronics free from flame retardant. Until government and industry catch up with these progressive trends, the best course of action is to limit exposure and lead the healthiest life possible.

http://www.thecanaryreport.org/

Church Awareness for MCS

Posted on October 28th, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity, Health News by Jonnie Wright

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

Accessibility for United Methodist Churches

The following is taken from Accessibility Audit for Churches, A United Methodist Resource Book about Accessibility. Page 9-10

http://www.holoweb.com/survivors/UMC_Statement.htm

Access for Those Who Are Chemically Sensitive
 
Indoor air pollution can be a serious deterrent to worship for people who have severe reactions to indoor and outdoor air pollution as well as to extremely low levels of chemicals generally regarded as safe. These reactions can occur in persons with severe illness (such as AIDS or asthma) or with multiple chemical sensitivities. Awareness of this disability is just emerging, and churches and other buildings typically have not been built or operated to take indoor and out-door air contaminants into account. However, we are becoming increasingly aware of links between environmental pollutants and sickness.
  
The National Academy of Sciences estimates that 15 percent of the population has some degree of sensitivity to chemicals. This population includes people from all areas of life and with a wide range of reactions. At one end of the range are those who merely have a headache when exposed to a neighbor’s perfume, but the headache will cease when the exposure is discontinued. Towards the other end of the range are those who have severe migraines that last for hours after the exposure is discontinued. Still other people may fall asleep during the sermon or experience debilitating fatigue for days or become confused and unable to think clearly because of reactions to chemicals in the church. Some may even lose physical coordination or experience seizures or life-threatening reactions. Disabilities caused by sensitivity to chemicals are often invisible and they come and go with exposure. Sometimes reactions are delayed until after the exposure. These are not allergic reactions and are often more severe than allergies.
 
The mechanism causing these reactions is not understood. Because of the lack of understanding and the invisible and situational causes of this disability, other people may mistakenly conclude that a person with special sensitivities is not really physically sick at all or could use ‘will power’ or drugs to overcome them. Such attitudinal barriers cause withdrawal of emotional and spiritual support at a time when it is most needed. Sufferers from chemical sensitivities not only have to cope with the strain of their disability but may also have to make drastic lifestyle changes such as giving up certain clothing, furniture, work, recreation, church, and friends.
  
Taking drugs, as some suggest, may actually increase the disability, because people who are chemically sensitive are often hypersensitive to drugs.
 
Making churches more accessible for people with environmental disabilities may seem to pre-sent a formidable challenge. Nevertheless, a large amount of improvement in air quality is achievable with very little effort. Sources of indoor pollution in church facilities include smoking; pesticides used and stored indoors; combustion exhaust from hot water heaters, furnaces, and gas stoves; volatile organic compounds in cleaning materials; fumes from laser printers, copiers, and other office equipment; air fresheners and deodorizers; interior mold and mildew; kerosene lamps and candles (particularly scented ones); recent remodeling; dyes and fixatives in new drapes, carpets, and upholstery; chemicals, particles, and microorganisms found in heating and cooling systems; asbestos and radon; and flowers that have been treated with pesticides. Inadequate fresh air brought into the ventilation system; improperly maintained filters and poor air duct design in such systems; and ventilation shared in common with rooms that have a source of contamination can aggravate indoor pollution problems. 
 
Sources of outdoor pollution include herbicides and pesticides used for lawn care and emissions from vehicles idling in the parking lot. Church members who are wearing scented products, hair sprays, freshly dry-cleaned clothing, or clothing that was cleaned with fabric softeners, or who have been in a smoky room, will significantly contribute to indoor air pollution. In fact, indoor air pollution and perfumes worn by fellow worshippers can make church one of the most difficult places to go for chemically sensitive persons.
  
Elimination of pollutants at their source is generally necessary for those who experience disabling reactions to low levels of pollution and to a variety of products (typically petrochemicals). While it may be extremely difficult to accommodate the most severely chemically sensitive, many with moderate levels of sensitivity can be accommodated relatively easily, and incremental additional efforts will help those with greater degrees of sensitivity. Churches will be rewarded for additional effort by the knowledge that they are not only performing an important ministry for the range of persons who are sensitive to chemicals but also helping others who do not realize they are affected by environmental pollution. They will also be increasing everyone’s awareness of environmental stewardship issues. The Accessibility Audit will provide a frame-work for beginning to consider indoor air pollution in order to make our churches more comfortable and less toxic for those who are healthy, as well as for those with multiple chemical sensitivities.
 
Rather than costing a lot of money, many accommodations for persons who are chemically sensitive may require no more than minor adjustments. Flexibility on the part of church leaders and a spirit of accommodation on the part of the congregation will go a long way towards individualizing circumstances to meet the needs of a particular chemically sensitive person. Churches may find that making these accommodations will increase the physical comfort level and alertness of many people who had not previously complained of pollutants. Churches may also find that they save money in the long run, as in the case of prohibiting smoking in church buildings or using hard flooring materials rather than carpeting.
 
Two United Methodist resources on indoor air pollution are: Indoor Air Quality: A Guide for Local/ Churches (stock #5136) and Church-Related Health Facilities and Indoor Air Quality (stock #5138), available in small quantities, free except for postage and handling, from the Service Center, General Board of Global Ministries, The United Methodist Church, 7820 Reading Road Caller No. 1800 Cincinnati OH 43222-1800.

CA Leads in Toxic in homes

Posted on October 2nd, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity, Health News by Jonnie Wright

Californians have world’s highest levels of flame retardants.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/californians-have-toxic-flame-retardants,562787.shtml

 PBDEs in dust

Californians have the world’s highest levels of toxic flame retardants in their homes and in their bodies, according to new scientific findings published Wednesday.

By Marla Cone
Editor in Chief
Environmental Health News
Published October 1, 2008
     
   Californians have the world’s highest levels of toxic flame retardants in their homes and in their bodies, according to new scientific findings published Wednesday.

Household=2 0dust tested in Richmond and Bolinas had four to ten times more brominated flame retardants than other American homes and 200 times more than European homes. Statewide, Californians had twice as much in their blood than other U.S. residents. The lower the income, the more contaminated the homes and the people who inhabit them.
  The main reason for California’s high exposure may be the state’s flammability standard for furniture, which is the most stringent in the world. To comply, many manufacturers added chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) to polyurethane foam cushions for couches and chairs.   “It’s sobering to realize that this one well-intended regulation in California has resulted in the global contamination of a persistent toxic pollutant,” said Ami Zota, a scientist at the Silent Spring Institute, a Massachusetts-based institution, who led the study. “These chemicals have been detected in nearly every species across the globe.”

  In animal studies, PBDEs alter development of the brain and reproductive system and disrupt thyroid hormones. Spreading from pole to pole via oceans, air and consumer products, they have been building up in the bodies of people and wildlife around the world,20 particularly in the United States.
       The study, published Wednesday in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, is the first regional examination of people’s exposure to the chemicals.
Kim Hooper, a scientist at the California Environmental Protection Agency’s laboratory in Berkeley who studies the flame retardants, said the new results add to other evidence that Californians are highly exposed. Previous tests of the breast milk of California women found high levels. Also, tests on California children, wildlife and pets have shown high concentrations.
     Combined, all the data “indicate that California has higher exposure than the rest of the nation,” Hooper said. “We’ve been concerned for five years about this and we’re glad that others are pointing it out, too. We need more action in this area.”
      Many toxicologists and other environmental scientists have considered the rapid accumulation of PBDEs in human breast milk and wildlife to be one of the most worrisome environmental health problems.
      In the new study, the scientists tested dust in 49 homes in the two Bay Area communities and compared the results with previous tests in the rest of North America and in Europe.
   The scientists also used federal data to compare blood concentrations of 276 Californians in four counties to people elsewhere. The Centers for Di sease Control and Prevention, which compiled the blood data, will not release the names of the counties.
    Dust from the Richmond houses had the highest levels, with concentrations three times higher than the Bolinas houses, according to the study.
   The Richmond dust contained six times more PBDEs than dust from Boston and Washington, D.C., and 15 times more than Cape Cod, Mass. The Bolinas dust had twice as much as Boston and Washington, D.C. and five times more than Cape Cod.
      Scientists suspect that the levels found in Richmond and Bolinas are mirrored throughout California.
    “The PBDE levels in both of these communities were significantly elevated. Both of them were high,” Zota said. “It’s interesting that even when you account for race, age, income, education, gender and country of origin, the difference between California and the rest of the country strongly persists.”
   Low-income people had higher PBDE levels in their homes and blood, perhaps because their furniture is older and more worn, according to the team of scientists from the Silent Spring Institute, UC Berkeley’s Department of Environmental Science and the Harvard School of Public Health.
     The study focused on Richmond as part of a larger project that is examining the cumulative impacts of an array of pollutants in a low-income, ethnically diverse community. Richmond is adjacent to two oil refineries, as w ell as other industrial plants and major freeways. Bolinas was chosen to compare exposures in an affluent, mainly Caucasian community that is not in an industrial area.
    People might be inhaling the compounds or absorbing them through their skin when foam cushions are torn or crumbling. Previous research has correlated the amount of PBDEs in people’s furniture to the amounts in their house dust.
        The most ubiquitous flame retardant found in the blood and dust—a compound called penta—already has been banned under California law.
    Robert Luedeka, director of the Polyurethane Foam Assn., a trade group for foam manufacturers, said U.S. manufacturers stopped adding penta to foam by the end of 2004.
     However, many households still have furniture manufactured before then, so the chemical remains in their homes. It also remains in the environment and in human bodies for years because it is slow to break down.
     Linda Birnbaum, director of experimental toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said she could not comment Wednesday on the new data. “But,” she said, “we think higher levels in California may be a reflection of the higher requirements for flame safety which has led to greater use of fire retardants in consumer products.”
    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is considering adopting California’s furniture flammability=2 0standard nationally. In addition, the state legislature is debating extending the standard to more products, including pillows and bed coverings.
   Luedeka said before 2005, much of the furniture sold nationwide contained penta.
   In the 1980s, little penta was used outside of California, Luedeka said. But its use in furniture increased in the 1990s because manufacturers wanted all products to comply with California’s flammability standard for economic and liability reasons, he said. By 2003, after researchers found that it was accumulating in human breast milk, its use slowed, and then stopped at the end of 2004 because of bans in California and Europe.
    “At its peak, penta was probably used in about one-third of all furniture sold outside California,” Luedeka said.
   Manufacturers now use other flame retardants, including some brominated ones, in furniture foam.
   Products that contain the chemicals are slower to burn in case of fire, but some scientists say more data are needed about the hazards of the compounds that replaced penta.
   Hooper said state scientists are now testing Californians’ blood and breast milk for the new flame retardants but data is not yet available.
    Compounding the concern, another PBDE, called deca, is still used in large volumes and also has been found in human bodies and house dust. It is added to plastic in some electronics equipment, including compu ters and TV sets.
      People have few ways to protect themselves from flame retardants. “We can’t throw all our furniture away,” Hooper said.
     “All of this points to the need for green chemistry, where you have alternatives, and points to the need to do more studies on chemicals of emerging concern,” he said. “We need to be wise about our choice of alternatives.
    Earlier this week, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation that requires state officials to adopt new rules by 2010 that identify chemicals of concern and reduce people’s exposure. 

Teens Go Green!

Posted on September 29th, 2008 in Life Issues, Chemical Sensitivity by Jonnie Wright

MCS Humor

Posted on September 21st, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity by Jonnie Wright

My Personal MCS Definitions

http://dontmesswithmcs.blogspot.com/2008/09/my-own-personal-mcs-definitions.html Below you’ll find a list of words I use to describe the effects of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and the world one lives in after the diagnosis.

Amy-noun-Amitriptyline-A beneficial MCS medication, at least for me. MCS interrupts healthy sleep cycles during the most important period of time the body has to repair itself. When I’m sleeping with Amy I might still wake up ten times a night, but I can quickly fall back into REM sleep every time. Before Amy, there was no REM sleep, period. I talked to Amy and she helped me get through the night.
AQI-noun-Air Quality Index. A numerical ratings system describing the volume of common air pollutants and it’s impact at predetermined levels on health, primarily the respiratory system. The AQI always sucks in places like Detroit and Cleveland.
Box-verb-To estimate the potential of a person to wear perfume or cologne based on their race, age, gender, or socio-economic status and act accordingly to MCS symptoms. I may have boxed her in, but damnit, I was right about the perfume, or, I shouldn’t have boxed him out but I didn’t want to take the chance of getting sick this week.
Breather-noun-A person without MCS. That breather had no idea what I was talking about.
Ding-verb-To suffer a short period of MCS symptoms like light persistent coughing, but to otherwise suffer no ill effects. I got a little dinged up leaving the office but other than that I’m OK.
Fry-verb-To experience a skin rash. The palms of my hands get fried because all the sprayers put on hand lotion or cologne and then leave trace amounts on door knobs, handles, and phones.
Hack Attack-noun-A lengthy period of intense coughing. I had a hack attack after lunch and the people at the table next to me were concerned.
Jones-noun-A state of persistent craving for an item prohibited by a MCS diet. I’ve got a jones for BBQ potato chips.
Juiced-verb-Exposure to a MCS irritant at a level certain to cause illness. She juiced me when she sprayed that room deodorizer.
Land Mine-noun-An unexpected and sudden exposure to MCS irritants in a place not normally expected. An example would be walking through the produce section of an organic grocery store to find a janitor mopping the floor with an ammonia based cleaner, or walking up to the checkout clerk who sprays 409 brand cleaner on the conveyor belt right when you arrive. I almost made it out OK and then I hit a land mine.
Morning Glory-noun-The characteristic of MCS where a substantial and debilitating symptom appears upon waking in the morning, without warning or any predictable cause. Normally associated with the migratory body pains of Fibromyalgia, and most likely due to the exposure of chemical irritants at a level below the body’s ability to sense them, but well beyond the ability of the MCS patient to tolerate them. A deliberately ironic twist of the urban slang’s original definition. I can remember when morning glory was a good thing. Now, thanks to the morning glory in my ankles, it hurts to walk.
Pepper Spray-noun-Airborne particulates of any type. I was hit with a blast of pepper spray after walking past that construction zone.
Power Tower-noun-A two level homemade high volume HEPA air purifier built purely for function, not aesthetics, and designed to alleviate symptoms of MCS. I run my power tower 24/7 and think every one should do the same.
Prisoner-noun-A person whose activities are restricted by MCS. I’m a prisoner in my own apartment.
Ride Report-noun-A graphical description of the experience related to, or the thoughts generated as a result of a bike ride. Normally of personal significance or pertaining to social observation. I can’t produce a ride report until the AQI improves.
Safe House-noun-The dwelling of a person with MCS, void of irritants and particulates. One never feels threatened inside the safe house.
Shooting Gallery-noun-The world of unexpected chemical dangers outside the safe house. When you have MCS, even the simplest chore is like walking through a chemical shooting gallery.
Spaceman-noun-How I refer to myself after having to dress in layers and wear protective gear covering all the skin and soft tissue if knowingly entering an area high in MCS irritants. I had to dress like a spaceman before going to the post office today.
Speaking in Tongue-verb-When two people with MCS communicate specifically about their symptoms or coping strategies. Often breathers are unable to truly understand the scope or depth of the illness, even if they genuinely are trying their best to imagine what it is like. Betty and I were speaking in tongues and the others looked at us like we were crazy.
Spook-verb-To frighten a breather who most likely is under the mistaken impression you’re wearing a respirator because you are contagious. That lady got spooked and did a 180 when she saw me coming down the grocery aisle.
Sprayer-noun-A person wearing perfume or cologne. The sprayers come out on in force on the weekends.
Squeeze-verb-The act of having your direction changed in order to avoid MCS irritants. That sprayer squeezed me out of the grocery aisle, I’ll have to go back there later after he leaves.
Stove Bomb-verb-To cook an entire week’s worth of food at once in order to limit exposure to airborne particulates caused by cooking itself. Terminology adopted from, and credit given to, an irreverent and whimsical sect of Portland’s bicycle subculture called zoo bombers. My fridge and freezer are full because I stove bombed last night.
Walking Papers-noun-A doctor prescribed regimen normally pertaining to exercise, but involving a physician’s mandate in any form. My walking papers recommend 30 minutes of exercise, 3-5 days a week, or, my walking papers tell me to eat at least 3 servings of fruit or vegetables a day.

Amputated Lives: Coping with Chemical Sensitivity

Posted on August 9th, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity, Health News by Jonnie Wright

 

In an article titled “Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A 1999 Consensus” that was published in Archives of Environmental Health, one group of 34 researchers and clinicians proposed the following criteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS):
1. The symptoms are reproducible with repeated exposure.
2. The condition is chronic.
3. Low levels of exposure result in manifestations of the syndrome.
4. The symptoms improve or resolve when the incitants are removed.
5. Responses occur to multiple chemically unrelated substances.
6. Symptoms involve multiple organ systems.

One of the most distinctive features of MCS is that people who develop the condition begin to react to low-level chemical exposures that never bothered them previously. Some MCS patients have only mild cases; for others the condition can be life threatening. In most cases, as the illness progresses, the patient reports that more and more substances cause symptoms. People with MCS can have a wide variety of symptoms as the result of chemical exposures, with different patients having different symptoms. A given patient, however, will usually have the same symptom in response to a given exposure, perhaps getting a headache after exposure to paint or getting arthritic pains after exposure to natural gas.

Newspaper reporters often refer to multiple chemical senstivity as a rare condition, but this is hardly the case. In 2004 the Archives of Environmental Health published a national prevalence study by Stan Caress and Anne Steinemann. These researchers reported that in their national random phone survey 2.5 percent of the respondents said that they had been diagnosed with MCS. This result suggests that over seven million Americans may be suffering from multiple chemical sensitivity, a number that exceeds the population of Massachusetts. This is hardly a “rare condition,” as it is frequently termed in the media.

Alison Johnson is the chair of the Chemical Sensitivity Foundation. You can find more information about chemical sensitivy on her website, www.alisonjohnsonmcs.com/, where you can get extensive information about her books and DVDs on the subject. You can play the first five minutes of the DVDs, as well as the complete “Chemical Sensitivity: A 15-Minute Introduction.”

——————————-

This article was originally published in FMOnline, vol. 8, no. 6 . This free online newsletter is only available to registered members.  http://www.fmaware.org

Top Tips for Dealing with Multiple Sensitivities–MCS

Posted on July 15th, 2008 in Chemical Sensitivity by Jonnie Wright

Managing Multiple Chemical Sensitivities1. If I know I am going to be where there will be flowers, perfumes, etc., I take an allergy pill 30 minutes beforehand. I also have told all my friends so when we get together they do not wear perfume, scented hair spray, or shower gels. 2. I avoid as much as possible any toxic smells. I bypass all stores that sell weed killers, etc.—also candle shops or aisles in the store that sells those products.

3. I stayed with a friend for a few days when our home was painted–and for three days afterward.

4. I always get “no smoking” rooms and bring my own pillows. If I am flying and have limited packing space, I bring my own pillowcases (printed with bright floral patterns so they don’t take them when changing the bed).

5. I use unscented detergents, fabric softener, shampoo, soap, etc.

6. I always wash brand new clothes before wearing them. If I get something dry-cleaned, I hang it outside for a day or so.

7. If I hear gardeners anywhere near my house, I close up and turn on the air conditioning.

8. I frequently change air filters, and have the ducts cleaned. I am not in the house when those things are done.  (My hubby even empties the lint filter on dryer.)

9. I am prone to migraines from sounds and flashing light. I do not go to movies or theaters. I wear dark sun glasses and good hunting ear plugs, and always have both in my purse. I wear an eye mask at night. I also wear large hats that cover a large part of my face.

10. If there is something on TV I really feel I must watch, I tape the show and use a lot of fast forward, therefore decreasing the amount of exposure.

11. Plan ahead. It helps!

—————————

This article was originally published in FMOnline. This free online newsletter is only available to registered members.

http://www.fmaware.org 

Next Page »
Powered by WebRing.